[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB647993508ACCA9B7B4938D24E3790@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 01:45:54 +0000
From: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
"nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
"Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add
compatible string for imx8qm
Hi
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 07:41:26PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > In order to support the two asrc modules in imx8qm, we need to add
> > compatible string "fsl,imx8qm-asrc0" and "fsl,imx8qm-asrc1"
>
> Are the blocks different in some way?
>
> If not, why do you need to distinguish them?
>
The internal clock mapping is different for each module.
Best regards
Wang Shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists