linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string for imx8qm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB6479DD8BDA0A8B6981F61532E3790@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:50:34 +0000
From:   "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To:     "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
        "Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string
 for imx8qm

Hi Rob
> 
> Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 07:41:26PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > In order to support the two asrc modules in imx8qm, we need to add
> > > compatible string "fsl,imx8qm-asrc0" and "fsl,imx8qm-asrc1"
> >
> > Are the blocks different in some way?
> >
> > If not, why do you need to distinguish them?
> >
> The internal clock mapping is different for each module.
> 

Or we can use one compatible string, but need add another property
"fsl,asrc-clk-map" to distinguish the different clock map.

The change is in below.

Which one do you think is better? 

Required properties:

-  - compatible         : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc" or "fsl,imx53-asrc".
+  - compatible         : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc", "fsl,imx53-asrc",
+                         "fsl,imx8qm-asrc".

   - reg                        : Offset and length of the register set for the device.

@@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ Required properties:

    - fsl,asrc-width    : Defines a mutual sample width used by DPCM Back Ends.

+   - fsl,asrc-clk-map   : Defines clock map used in driver. which is required
+                         by imx8qm
+                         <0> - select the map for asrc0
+                         <1> - select the map for asrc1
+
 Optional properties:


Best regards
Wang shengjiu