linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND v2 4/4] KVM: ensure vCPU halt_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  6 Nov 2019 19:55:02 +0800
From:   Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, joao.m.martins@...cle.com,
        mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 4/4] KVM: ensure vCPU halt_poll_us in right scope

As user can adjust halt_poll_ns_grow_start and halt_poll_ns which
leads to vcpu->halt_poll_ns beyond the two boundaries. This patch
ensures vcpu->halt_poll_ns in that scope after growing or shrinking.

If halt_poll_ns_shrink is 0, shrink vcpu->halt_poll_ns to
halt_poll_ns_grow_start instead of 0. To disable poll we can set
halt_poll_ns to 0.

In case user wrongly set halt_poll_ns_grow_start > halt_poll_ns > 0,
halt_poll_ns take precedency and poll time is a fixed value of
halt_poll_ns.

This patch also simplifies branch check based on the guest haltpoll
code.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 359516b..b4fca66 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2308,9 +2308,15 @@ static void shrink_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	old = val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
 	shrink = READ_ONCE(halt_poll_ns_shrink);
 	if (shrink == 0)
-		val = 0;
-	else
+		val = halt_poll_ns_grow_start;
+	else {
 		val /= shrink;
+		if (val < halt_poll_ns_grow_start)
+			val = halt_poll_ns_grow_start;
+	}
+
+	if (val > halt_poll_ns)
+		val = halt_poll_ns;
 
 	vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val;
 	trace_kvm_halt_poll_ns_shrink(vcpu->vcpu_id, val, old);
@@ -2385,21 +2391,12 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
 
 	if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {
-		if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu)) {
+		/* we had a long block, shrink polling */
+		if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu) || block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
 			shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
-		} else if (halt_poll_ns) {
-			if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
-				;
-			/* we had a long block, shrink polling */
-			else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
-				shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
-			/* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
-			else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
-				block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
-				grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
-		} else {
-			vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
-		}
+		/* we had a short block and our poll time is too small */
+		else if (block_ns > vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
+			grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
-- 
1.8.3.1