[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL3NOstoa5ZY1JE9e3Ay=WTmz153H-KbHErhi-GBX-5GA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 08:24:59 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading to
> one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard.
>
> This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections and
> will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles.
That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up...
This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and we
finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus' tree).
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists