[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191106164756.GA558585@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:47:56 -0500
From: Mohammad Nasirifar <far.nasiri.m@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mohammad Nasirifar <farnasirim@...il.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] syscalls: Fix references to filenames containing
syscall defs
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:49:12AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 10:34 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Mohammad Nasirifar wrote:
>> > Fix stale references to files containing syscall definitions in
>> > 'include/linux/syscalls.h' and 'include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h',
>> > pointing to 'kernel/itimer.c', 'kernel/hrtimer.c', and 'kernel/time.c'.
>> > They are now under 'kernel/time'.
>> >
>> > Also definitions of 'getpid', 'getppid', 'getuid', 'geteuid', 'getgid',
>> > 'getegid', 'gettid', and 'sysinfo' are now in 'kernel/sys.c'.
>>
>> Can we please remove these file references completely. They are going to be
>> stale sooner than later again and they really do not provide any value.
I actually refer to them a lot when locating syscall implementations,
which is how I found out that they were stale in the first place.
>
>+1
>
>Good idea!
>
>In the long run, I'd prefer to have a parsable format that can be used to
>generate both the header file and the stubs that we currently provide
>using SYSCALL_DEFINEx(), but before that I'd like the remaining two
>unistd.h files to be converted to syscall.tbl format (Nitesh is still working
>on that).
Sorry I didn't understand, is there anything I can do to follow up on this?
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists