[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-q16Z=tyeb3b5NnjBkw9cRoeEM6OQaT6dGe1i+9iJa9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:01:54 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Return EFI_RESERVED_TYPE in efi_mem_type() for
absent addresses
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 21:39, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
>
> The function efi_mem_type() is expected (per documentation above) to return
> EFI_RESERVED_TYPE when a given physical address is not present in the EFI
> memory map. Even though EFI_RESERVED_TYPE is not getting checked explicitly
> anywhere in the callers, it is always better to return expected values.
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
This reverts commit f99afd08a45fbbd9ce35a7624ffd1d850a1906c0.
Could you explain why it is better to fix the code than fix the comment?
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 69f00f7453a3..bdda90a4601e 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ int efi_mem_type(unsigned long phys_addr)
> (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT))))
> return md->type;
> }
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return EFI_RESERVED_TYPE;
> }
> #endif
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists