[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b70644d6-2c71-cd71-5d00-e25d99beea91@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:08:40 +0100
From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@....ibm.com>, alastair@...ilva.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ocxl: Conditionally bind SCM devices to the generic
OCXL driver
Le 25/10/2019 à 06:47, Alastair D'Silva a écrit :
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
>
> This patch allows the user to bind OpenCAPI SCM devices to the generic OCXL
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> ---
I'm wondering if we should upstream this. Is it of any use outside of
some serious debug session for a developer?
Also we would now have 2 drivers picking up the same device ID, since
the SCM driver is always registering for that ID, irrespective of
CONFIG_OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
Fred
> drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> index 1916fa65f2f2..8a683715c97c 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> @@ -29,3 +29,10 @@ config OCXL
> dedicated OpenCAPI link, and don't follow the same protocol.
>
> If unsure, say N.
> +
> +config OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
> + bool "Treat OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory as a generic OpenCAPI device"
> + default n
> + help
> + Select this option to treat OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory
> + devices an generic OpenCAPI devices.
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> index cb920aa88d3a..7137055c1883 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
> */
> static const struct pci_device_id ocxl_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, 0x062B), },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, 0x0625), },
> +#endif
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, ocxl_pci_tbl);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists