| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:29:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aaron.lwe@...il.com, valentin.schneider@....com, mingo@...nel.org,
pauld@...hat.com, jdesfossez@...italocean.com,
naravamudan@...italocean.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
kernel-team@...roid.com, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 07:43:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But you mean something like:
>
> for (class = prev->sched_class; class; class = class->next) {
> if (class->balance(rq, rf))
> break;
> }
>
> put_prev_task(rq, prev);
>
> for_each_class(class) {
> p = class->pick_next_task(rq);
> if (p)
> return p;
> }
>
> BUG();
>
> like?
I still havne't had food, but this here compiles...
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++--
kernel/sched/idle.c | 8 +++++++-
kernel/sched/rt.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 +++--
kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 8 +++++++-
7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index eb42b71faab9..d9909606806d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3929,13 +3929,17 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
}
restart:
- /*
- * Ensure that we put DL/RT tasks before the pick loop, such that they
- * can PULL higher prio tasks when we lower the RQ 'priority'.
- */
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
- if (!rq->nr_running)
- newidle_balance(rq, rf);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ for (class = prev->sched_class;
+ class != &idle_sched_class;
+ class = class->next) {
+
+ if (class->balance(rq, prev, rf))
+ break;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ put_prev_task(rq, prev);
for_each_class(class) {
p = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
@@ -6201,7 +6205,7 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_migrate_task(struct rq *rq)
for_each_class(class) {
next = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
if (next) {
- next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next, NULL);
+ next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);
return next;
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 2dc48720f189..b6c3fb10cf57 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1778,15 +1778,9 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
return p;
}
-static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
- update_curr_dl(rq);
-
- update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
- if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
- enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
-
- if (rf && !on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
+ if (!on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
/*
* This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
* picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
@@ -1797,6 +1791,18 @@ static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_fla
pull_dl_task(rq);
rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
}
+
+ return rq->dl.dl_nr_running > 0;
+}
+
+
+static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ update_curr_dl(rq);
+
+ update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
+ if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
}
/*
@@ -2438,6 +2444,7 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_dl,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_dl,
+ .balance = balance_dl,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_dl,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_dl,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a14487462b6c..6b983214e00f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6746,10 +6746,18 @@ done: __maybe_unused;
return NULL;
}
+static int balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ if (rq->cfs.nr_running)
+ return 1;
+
+ return newidle_balance(rq, rf) != 0;
+}
+
/*
* Account for a descheduled task:
*/
-static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct sched_entity *se = &prev->se;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
@@ -10609,7 +10617,7 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_fair,
-
+ .balance = balance_fair,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_fair,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 8dad5aa600ea..2ff65fd2fe7e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -375,7 +375,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl
resched_curr(rq);
}
-static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ return 1; /* always runnable */
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
}
@@ -456,6 +461,7 @@ const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_idle,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_idle,
+ .balance = balance_idle,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_idle,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_idle,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index ebaa4e619684..3aa3e0fca796 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1566,20 +1566,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
return p;
}
-static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
- update_curr_rt(rq);
-
- update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
-
- /*
- * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
- * if it is still active
- */
- if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
- enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
-
- if (rf && !on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
+ if (!on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
/*
* This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
* picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
@@ -1590,6 +1579,22 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_fla
pull_rt_task(rq);
rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
}
+
+ return rq->rt.rt_queued > 0;
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ update_curr_rt(rq);
+
+ update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
+
+ /*
+ * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
+ * if it is still active
+ */
+ if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -2362,6 +2367,7 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_rt,
+ .balance = balance_rt,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_rt,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0db2c1b3361e..3b50450428dc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1727,7 +1727,8 @@ struct sched_class {
struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq,
struct task_struct *prev,
struct rq_flags *rf);
- void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf);
+ int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
+ void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1773,7 +1774,7 @@ struct sched_class {
static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != prev);
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, NULL);
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
}
static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
index 7e1cee4e65b2..8a5b3e5540ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -60,7 +60,12 @@ static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
BUG(); /* the stop task should never yield, its pointless. */
}
-static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
u64 delta_exec;
@@ -125,6 +130,7 @@ const struct sched_class stop_sched_class = {
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_stop,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_stop,
+ .balance = balance_stop,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_stop,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_stop,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists