linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: provide interface for retrieving kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:50:55 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
cc:     Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: provide interface for retrieving kmem_cache name

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:

> On Thu 07-11-19 13:26:09, Knut Omang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 12:58 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 07-11-19 12:54:04, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > > With the restructuring done in commit 9adeaa226988
> > > > ("mm, slab: move memcg_cache_params structure to mm/slab.h")
> > > > 
> > > > it is no longer possible for code external to mm to access
> > > > the name of a kmem_cache as struct kmem_cache has effectively become
> > > > opaque. Having access to the cache name is helpful to kernel testing
> > > > infrastructure.
> > > > 
> > > > Expose a new function kmem_cache_name to mitigate that.
> > > 
> > > Who is going to use that symbol? It is preferred that a user is added in
> > > the same patch as the newly added symbol.
> > 
> > Yes, I am aware that that's the normal practice, 
> > we're currently using cache->name directly in the kernel 
> > unit test framework KTF (https://github.com/oracle/ktf/)
> > which we are working (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/13/111) to get 
> > into the kernel in one form or another.
> 
> Please add the export with a patch that really needs it.
> 

Agree, this patch could be added as a predecessor to the series at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/13/111 which would use it.  If it's obvious 
why using the kmem cache name is useful in that series, acking this will 
be a no brainer.