linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/11] mm: vmscan: split shrink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALvZod7EFBD0SCoUFHacEtZqi7hcZ3S6FEZRmfJJORre3dxRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:51:59 -0800
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] mm: vmscan: split shrink_node() into node part and
 memcgs part

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:00 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> This function is getting long and unwieldy. The new shrink_node()
> handles the generic (node) reclaim aspects:
>   - global vmpressure notifications
>   - writeback and congestion throttling
>   - reclaim/compaction management
>   - kswapd giving up on unreclaimable nodes
>
> It then calls shrink_node_memcgs() which handles cgroup specifics:
>   - the cgroup tree traversal
>   - memory.low considerations
>   - per-cgroup slab shrinking callbacks
>   - per-cgroup vmpressure notifications
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>


> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b85111474ee2..ee79b39d0538 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2665,24 +2665,15 @@ static bool pgdat_memcg_congested(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                 (memcg && memcg_congested(pgdat, memcg));
>  }
>
> -static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> +static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
> -       struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>         struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
>         struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
>                 .pgdat = pgdat,
>                 .priority = sc->priority,
>         };
> -       unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> -       bool reclaimable = false;
>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>
> -again:
> -       memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr));
> -
> -       nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
> -       nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
> -
>         memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
>         do {
>                 struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
> @@ -2750,6 +2741,22 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>                         break;
>                 }
>         } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim)));
> +}
> +
> +static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> +       struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
> +       struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> +       unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> +       bool reclaimable = false;
> +
> +again:
> +       memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr));
> +
> +       nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
> +       nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
> +
> +       shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
>
>         if (reclaim_state) {
>                 sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> @@ -2757,7 +2764,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>         }
>
>         /* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
> -       vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
> +       vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, root, true,
>                    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>                    sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>