[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191107071843.GN10409@kadam>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:18:43 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: create UUIDs for file systems that do not set the
superblock UUID
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:08:44AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
> index a8279280e88d..a0227c31fe17 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ struct ovl_config {
> struct ovl_sb {
> struct super_block *sb;
> dev_t pseudo_dev;
> + /* Unusable (conflicting) uuid */
> + bool nouuid;
Could we name this ignore_uuid, skip_uuid or bad_uuid or something?
Otherwise we end up with double negatives.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists