[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB58167B95AF6B7CDB39D24C52E7780@BYAPR04MB5816.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:54:04 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: Andrea Vai <andrea.vai@...pv.it>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...ium.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@....com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Slow I/O on USB media after commit
f664a3cc17b7d0a2bc3b3ab96181e1029b0ec0e6
On 2019/11/07 16:04, Andrea Vai wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 06/11/2019 alle 22.13 +0000, Damien Le Moal ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> Please simply try your write tests after doing this:
>>
>> echo mq-deadline > /sys/block/<name of your USB
>> disk>/queue/scheduler
>>
>> And confirm that mq-deadline is selected with:
>>
>> cat /sys/block/<name of your USB disk>/queue/scheduler
>> [mq-deadline] kyber bfq none
>
> ok, which kernel should I test with this: the fresh git cloned, or the
> one just patched with Alan's patch, or doesn't matter which one?
Probably all of them to see if there are any differences.
>
> Thanks, and bye,
> Andrea
>
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists