[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaFzW5BGgK=p8MANJn23VC5X2oBh4oYhZJOOBPT2aJmSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:15:21 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"vilhelm.gray@...il.com" <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/62] gpio: gpio-104-dio-48e: Use new GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 7:58 AM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 16:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Oh the patch bomb already dropped, hehe.
>
> I was slightly impatient ^_^;
No big deal.
> > Anyways I want one
> > big patch to apply. Please make sure it applies on the GPIO tree's
> > "devel" branch.
>
> Right. I guess I can do that.
Thanks!
> > Collect any ACKs and drop most from the CC else the driver
> > maintainers may get annoyed.
>
> My problem is that I don't know who are the driver maintainers I should
> keep and who I should drop. I don't usually know who are interested in
> which changes.
The process is not perfect, just some best effort is fine, as subsystem
maintainer I do merge mechanical patches like this across all drivers
without consent of every possible stakeholder, it's impossible to
involve everyone.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists