linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:48:49 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:57 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> I have waited for comments on x86 bits from Thomas, but since they are
> not coming, I have just decided to take patch [1/12] from this series,
> which should be totally non-controversial,  as keeping it out of the
> tree has become increasingly painful (material depending on it has
> been piling up already for some time).

Sorry for letting this slip through the cracks.

>From x86 side I don't see any issues. It's mostly EFI stuff which Ard has
looked at already. So feel free to pick up the lot

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>