[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191107143810.oon6bj7dc7xqcyxe@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:38:10 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: improve stack dumping
On Wed 2019-11-06 16:21:51, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:34 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -512,10 +510,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> > > for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
> > > if (kstack_end(sp))
> > > break;
> > > - pr_cont(" %08lx", *sp++);
> > > + sprintf(buf + (i % 8) * 9, " %08lx", *sp++);
> > > if (i % 8 == 7)
> > > - pr_cont("\n");
> > > + pr_info("%s\n", buf);
> > > }
> > > + if (i % 8)
> > > + pr_info("%s\n", buf);
> >
> > Could this be done using hex_dump_to_buffer
> > by precalculating kstack_end ?
>
> I've got this, but it doesn't look very attractive to me:
>
> void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> {
> unsigned long *stack;
> int len;
>
> if (!sp)
> sp = stack_pointer(task);
> stack = sp;
>
> len = min((-(unsigned long)stack) & (THREAD_SIZE - 4),
> kstack_depth_to_print * 4ul);
>
> pr_info("Stack:\n");
>
> for (; len > 0; len -= 32) {
> char buf[9 * 8 + 1];
>
> hex_dump_to_buffer(sp, min(len, 32), 32, 4,
> buf, sizeof(buf), false);
> pr_info(" %08lx: %s\n", (unsigned long)sp, buf);
> sp += 8;
> }
I wonder if the cycle actually could get replaced by a single call:
print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
16, 1, sp, len, false);
print_hex_dump() currently does not allow to print 8 bytes per-line.
Either 16 is acceptable or hex_dump() function could be updated.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists