[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191107152244.GD4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:22:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Speed booting by sorting ORC unwind tables at
build time
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:32:01PM +0800, shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> From: Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> I found the unwind_init taken long time (more than 90ms) in kernel
> booting, mainly spent on sorting the two ORC unwind tables, orc_unwind
> and orc_unwind_ip.
>
> I also noticed that this issued has reported and discussed last year:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/8/342
> But seems no final solution until now, I tried to sort the ORC tables at
> build time, followed the helpful hints from Josh and Ingo in that thread.
> And mainly referred the implementation of 'sortextable' tool:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/1334872799-14589-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com/
>
> What I did:
>
> - Add a Kconfig to control build-time sorting or runtime sorting;
> - Referred 'sortextable', create a similar helper tool 'sortorctable',
> help to sort the ORC unwind tables at vmlinux link process.
What is the build-time cost for doing this? The link phase is already a
fairly big bottleneck for building a kernel.
Can sort{ex,orc}table() be ran concurrently? Do they want to be the same
(threaded) tool?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists