[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191107170258.36379-5-leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:02:58 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/kvm/e500: Replace current->mm by kvm->mm
Given that in kvm_create_vm() there is:
kvm->mm = current->mm;
And that on every kvm_*_ioctl we have:
if (kvm->mm != current->mm)
return -EIO;
I see no reason to keep using current->mm instead of kvm->mm.
By doing so, we would reduce the use of 'global' variables on code, relying
more in the contents of kvm struct.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
index 321db0fdb9db..425d13806645 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
@@ -355,9 +355,9 @@ static inline int kvmppc_e500_shadow_map(struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
if (tlbsel == 1) {
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read(&kvm->mm->mmap_sem);
- vma = find_vma(current->mm, hva);
+ vma = find_vma(kvm->mm, hva);
if (vma && hva >= vma->vm_start &&
(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP)) {
/*
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static inline int kvmppc_e500_shadow_map(struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
tsize = max(BOOK3E_PAGESZ_4K, tsize & ~1);
}
- up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
+ up_read(&kvm->mm->mmap_sem);
}
if (likely(!pfnmap)) {
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists