lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a2d491f-3d24-3673-07f3-f601d5fafc97@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:26:39 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc:     Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, drbd-dev@...n.linbit.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in
 __drbd_send_protocol()

On 11/6/19 11:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
> this ends up being a double unlock.

Is there a typo in the patch subject (stay -> stray)?

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ