[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a2d491f-3d24-3673-07f3-f601d5fafc97@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:26:39 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, drbd-dev@...n.linbit.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in
__drbd_send_protocol()
On 11/6/19 11:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
> this ends up being a double unlock.
Is there a typo in the patch subject (stay -> stray)?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists