linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 11/11] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Make vlpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191108165805.3071-12-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  8 Nov 2019 16:58:05 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        Andrew.Murray@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
        Heyi Guo <guoheyi@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Make vlpi_lock a spinlock

The VLPI map is currently a mutex, and that's a bad idea as
this lock can be taken in non-preemptible contexts. Convert
it to a raw spinlock, and turn the memory allocation of the
VLPI map to be atomic.

Reported-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index ae4acd13f97a..20be6adb2458 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct event_lpi_map {
 	u16			*col_map;
 	irq_hw_number_t		lpi_base;
 	int			nr_lpis;
-	struct mutex		vlpi_lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t		vlpi_lock;
 	struct its_vm		*vm;
 	struct its_vlpi_map	*vlpi_maps;
 	int			nr_vlpis;
@@ -1433,13 +1433,13 @@ static int its_vlpi_map(struct irq_data *d, struct its_cmd_info *info)
 	if (!info->map)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 
 	if (!its_dev->event_map.vm) {
 		struct its_vlpi_map *maps;
 
 		maps = kcalloc(its_dev->event_map.nr_lpis, sizeof(*maps),
-			       GFP_KERNEL);
+			       GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (!maps) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@ static int its_vlpi_map(struct irq_data *d, struct its_cmd_info *info)
 	}
 
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ static int its_vlpi_get(struct irq_data *d, struct its_cmd_info *info)
 	struct its_vlpi_map *map;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 
 	map = get_vlpi_map(d);
 
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static int its_vlpi_get(struct irq_data *d, struct its_cmd_info *info)
 	*info->map = *map;
 
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ static int its_vlpi_unmap(struct irq_data *d)
 	u32 event = its_get_event_id(d);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 
 	if (!its_dev->event_map.vm || !irqd_is_forwarded_to_vcpu(d)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ static int its_vlpi_unmap(struct irq_data *d)
 	}
 
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&its_dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2605,7 +2605,7 @@ static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id,
 	dev->event_map.col_map = col_map;
 	dev->event_map.lpi_base = lpi_base;
 	dev->event_map.nr_lpis = nr_lpis;
-	mutex_init(&dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&dev->event_map.vlpi_lock);
 	dev->device_id = dev_id;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->entry);
 
-- 
2.20.1