[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191108170120.22331-13-will@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:01:19 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yunjae Lee <lyj7694@...il.com>,
SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments
'smp_read_barrier_depends()' doesn't exist any more, so reword the two
comments that mention it to refer to "dependency ordering" instead.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 2 +-
include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
index 7aef0abc194a..246760b93715 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static inline bool __ref_is_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref,
* between contaminating the pointer value, meaning that
* READ_ONCE() is required when fetching it.
*
- * The smp_read_barrier_depends() implied by READ_ONCE() pairs
+ * The dependency ordering from the READ_ONCE() pairs
* with smp_store_release() in __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu().
*/
percpu_ptr = READ_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr);
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 0abe9a4fc842..b6e94b60fc12 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr)
return -ENOSPC;
/* Make sure the pointer we are storing points to a valid data. */
- /* Pairs with smp_read_barrier_depends in __ptr_ring_consume. */
+ /* Pairs with the dependency ordering in __ptr_ring_consume. */
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(r->queue[r->producer++], ptr);
--
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists