[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191108174808.095664632@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 19:50:18 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Thiemo Nagel <tnagel@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 38/79] dccp: do not leak jiffies on the wire
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 3d1e5039f5f87a8731202ceca08764ee7cb010d3 ]
For some reason I missed the case of DCCP passive
flows in my previous patch.
Fixes: a904a0693c18 ("inet: stop leaking jiffies on the wire")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Thiemo Nagel <tnagel@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_v4_request_recv_sock(c
RCU_INIT_POINTER(newinet->inet_opt, rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt));
newinet->mc_index = inet_iif(skb);
newinet->mc_ttl = ip_hdr(skb)->ttl;
- newinet->inet_id = jiffies;
+ newinet->inet_id = prandom_u32();
if (dst == NULL && (dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req)) == NULL)
goto put_and_exit;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists