linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 42/62] net: add skb_queue_empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191108174749.326432373@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  8 Nov 2019 19:50:30 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 42/62] net: add skb_queue_empty_lockless()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit d7d16a89350ab263484c0aa2b523dd3a234e4a80 ]

Some paths call skb_queue_empty() without holding
the queue lock. We must use a barrier in order
to not let the compiler do strange things, and avoid
KCSAN splats.

Adding a barrier in skb_queue_empty() might be overkill,
I prefer adding a new helper to clearly identify
points where the callers might be lockless. This might
help us finding real bugs.

The corresponding WRITE_ONCE() should add zero cost
for current compilers.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -1346,6 +1346,19 @@ static inline int skb_queue_empty(const
 }
 
 /**
+ *	skb_queue_empty_lockless - check if a queue is empty
+ *	@list: queue head
+ *
+ *	Returns true if the queue is empty, false otherwise.
+ *	This variant can be used in lockless contexts.
+ */
+static inline bool skb_queue_empty_lockless(const struct sk_buff_head *list)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(list->next) == (const struct sk_buff *) list;
+}
+
+
+/**
  *	skb_queue_is_last - check if skb is the last entry in the queue
  *	@list: queue head
  *	@skb: buffer
@@ -1709,9 +1722,11 @@ static inline void __skb_insert(struct s
 				struct sk_buff *prev, struct sk_buff *next,
 				struct sk_buff_head *list)
 {
-	newsk->next = next;
-	newsk->prev = prev;
-	next->prev  = prev->next = newsk;
+	/* see skb_queue_empty_lockless() for the opposite READ_ONCE() */
+	WRITE_ONCE(newsk->next, next);
+	WRITE_ONCE(newsk->prev, prev);
+	WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, newsk);
+	WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, newsk);
 	list->qlen++;
 }
 
@@ -1722,11 +1737,11 @@ static inline void __skb_queue_splice(co
 	struct sk_buff *first = list->next;
 	struct sk_buff *last = list->prev;
 
-	first->prev = prev;
-	prev->next = first;
+	WRITE_ONCE(first->prev, prev);
+	WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, first);
 
-	last->next = next;
-	next->prev = last;
+	WRITE_ONCE(last->next, next);
+	WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, last);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1867,8 +1882,8 @@ static inline void __skb_unlink(struct s
 	next	   = skb->next;
 	prev	   = skb->prev;
 	skb->next  = skb->prev = NULL;
-	next->prev = prev;
-	prev->next = next;
+	WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev);
+	WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
 }
 
 /**