[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d607c661be2459f005d2cd6329c779f09d31fa9.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:26:46 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
jank@...ence.com, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/4] soundwire: sdw_slave: add new fields
to track probe status
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 08:55 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Please start with the patches "soundwire: code hardening and
> suspend-resume support" and come back to this interface description when
> you have reviewed these changes. It's not detective work, it's working
> around the consequences of having separate trees for Audio and SoundWire.
Separate trees seem to be clearly not working well for everyone
atm. I'm reading the discomfort on all sides here.
Vinod, how often do you merge on ALSA/ASoC ? Would it not make more
sense to be part of ALSA to ease workflow (including yours) ?
This model worked well for soundwire's predecessors (AC97 and HDA)
which like soundwire were primarily audio busses with secondary non
audio features.
Liam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists