linux-kernel - Re: [patch 3/9] x86/cpu: Unify cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a9a1995-d0a3-a3c6-a177-911d7560430c@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:34:50 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] x86/cpu: Unify cpu_init()

On 11/6/19 11:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Similar to copy_thread_tls() the 32bit and 64bit implementations of
> cpu_init() are very similar and unification avoids duplicate changes in the
> future.
> 

I believe you :)

Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>