lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 08 Nov 2019 08:16:59 +0000
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>,
        Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: make more headers self-contained

Quoting Masahiro Yamada (2019-11-08 05:42:33)
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:15 PM Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > The headers in the gem/selftests/, gt/selftests, gvt/, selftests/
> > directories have never been compile-tested, but it would be possible
> > to make them self-contained.
> >
> > This commit only addresses missing <linux/types.h> and forward
> > struct declarations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> 
> I confirmed this patch is applicable to next-20191107
> but CI fails to apply it.

CI is ahead of -next, even more so before the merge window when our MR
trees (used for -next) are frozen, but development continues.
 
> Which branch should I base my patch on?

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/ #drm-tip
-Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ