[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <46d72d7b2f91900c4499db127e365baade38e18c.camel@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:37:14 +1100
From: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@....ibm.com>
To: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ocxl: Conditionally bind SCM devices to the
generic OCXL driver
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 19:08 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
> Le 25/10/2019 à 06:47, Alastair D'Silva a écrit :
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> >
> > This patch allows the user to bind OpenCAPI SCM devices to the
> > generic OCXL
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> > ---
>
> I'm wondering if we should upstream this. Is it of any use outside
> of
> some serious debug session for a developer?
> Also we would now have 2 drivers picking up the same device ID,
> since
> the SCM driver is always registering for that ID, irrespective of
> CONFIG_OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
>
> Fred
>
I think I'll drop this patch. It's easy enough to maintain out-of-tree
for our in-house SCM hardware engineers.
>
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> > index 1916fa65f2f2..8a683715c97c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig
> > @@ -29,3 +29,10 @@ config OCXL
> > dedicated OpenCAPI link, and don't follow the same protocol.
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> > +
> > +config OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
> > + bool "Treat OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory as a generic OpenCAPI
> > device"
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + Select this option to treat OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory
> > + devices an generic OpenCAPI devices.
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> > index cb920aa88d3a..7137055c1883 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/pci.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
> > */
> > static const struct pci_device_id ocxl_pci_tbl[] = {
> > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, 0x062B), },
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OCXL_SCM_GENERIC
> > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, 0x0625), },
> > +#endif
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, ocxl_pci_tbl);
> >
--
Alastair D'Silva
Open Source Developer
Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia
mob: 0423 762 819
Powered by blists - more mailing lists