lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:05:40 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] coresight: replicator: Fix missing spin_lock_init()

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 11:47:11AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 04:57, Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > The driver allocates the spinlock but not initialize it.
> > Use spin_lock_init() on it to initialize it correctly.
> >
> > This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> >
> > Fixes: 0093875ad129 ("coresight: Serialize enabling/disabling a link device.")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > index 43304196a1a6..e7dc1c31d20d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> > @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int replicator_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> >         }
> >         dev->platform_data = pdata;
> >
> > +       spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock);
> 
> I have applied both patches but removed the "Fixes" line since the
> commit is only visible in my local coresight next tree.
> 

Unless you rebase the tree, then the Fixes tag will still be valid.
(Probably local implies you rebase it I guess).

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ