lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191108105213.GR10409@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:53:19 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Beniamin Bia <beniamin.bia@...log.com>
Cc:     jic23@...nel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        lars@...afoo.de, biabeniamin@...look.com,
        Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
        Paul Cercueil <paul.cercueil@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] iio: adc: Add support for AD7091R5 ADC

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Beniamin Bia wrote:
> +static int ad7091r_set_mode(struct ad7091r_state *st, enum ad7091r_mode mode)
> +{
> +	int ret, conf;
> +
> +	switch (mode) {
> +	case AD7091R_MODE_SAMPLE:
> +		conf = 0;
> +		break;
> +	case AD7091R_MODE_COMMAND:
> +		conf = AD7091R_REG_CONF_CMD;
> +		break;
> +	case AD7091R_MODE_AUTOCYCLE:
> +		conf = AD7091R_REG_CONF_AUTO;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		break;

return -EINVAL;

> +	}
> +
> +	ret = regmap_update_bits(st->map, AD7091R_REG_CONF,
> +				 AD7091R_REG_CONF_MODE_MASK, conf);


otherwise conf is uninitialized.

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	st->mode = mode;
> +
> +	return ret;

return 0;

> +}
> +
> +static int ad7091r_set_channel(struct ad7091r_state *st, unsigned int channel)
> +{
> +	unsigned int foo;

Use unsigned int dummy.

> +	int ret;
> +

Otherwise it looks ok to me.  (Not a domain expert).

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ