[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP_AXiZaRUaKXxBOkoK8bh+V1oh6hxMsobCjbyNq_FGpGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:01:19 +0100
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdb: fix spelling mistake "requeueing" -> "requeuing"
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:36 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There is a spelling mistake in a debug message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 39136675dae5..8e1595d09138 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -4230,7 +4230,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
> * lock owner acked, but resend if we don't see them
> * release the lock
> */
> - dout("%s rbd_dev %p requeueing lock_dwork\n", __func__,
> + dout("%s rbd_dev %p requeuing lock_dwork\n", __func__,
> rbd_dev);
> mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork,
> msecs_to_jiffies(2 * RBD_NOTIFY_TIMEOUT * MSEC_PER_SEC));
Applied, after fixing the spelling mistake in the title ;)
Thanks,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists