[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYMvVwEB7H5TDK4BBk_e=vTtY4-X8DDa5PD=ggCQn3PHvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:35:56 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@...m.com>,
"tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Carriere Etienne <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
Hi Jens,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 16:09, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:41 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 16:36, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Sumit,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:37:54PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
> > > > dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
> > > > during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().
> > > >
> > > > So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
> > > > optee_shm_register().
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Looks good, I'm picking this up. Etienne told me has tested this on some
> > > of his hardware so I'll add:
> > > Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for picking this up.
> >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
> > > > to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.
> >
> > You also need to pick up the dependency patch too. The latest v3 of
> > this patch is here [1] although its unchanged from v2. Also, If you
> > pick that up I will drop it from future revisions of Trusted Keys
> > patchset [2].
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/431
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/430
>
> So I missed taking [1] into account. I think that it would make more
> sense to merge this patch ("tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool
> allocations") with [1] ("tee: optee: allow kernel pages to register as
> shm") into a new patch.
Sure, will send v2 as merged patch instead.
-Sumit
> Cheers,
> Jens
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> > > >
> > > > drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > > {
> > > > unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> > > > struct page *page;
> > > > + int rc = 0;
> > > >
> > > > page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> > > > if (!page)
> > > > @@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > > shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
> > > > shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
> > > >
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
> > > > + shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
> > > > + rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
> > > > + (unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return rc;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > > struct tee_shm *shm)
> > > > {
> > > > + if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
> > > > + optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
> > > > +
> > > > free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
> > > > shm->kaddr = NULL;
> > > > }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists