[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191108114310.14363-93-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:42:58 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 093/103] blok, bfq: do not plug I/O if all queues are weight-raised
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
[ Upstream commit c8765de0adfcaaf4ffb2d951e07444f00ffa9453 ]
To reduce latency for interactive and soft real-time applications, bfq
privileges the bfq_queues containing the I/O of these
applications. These privileged queues, referred-to as weight-raised
queues, get a much higher share of the device throughput
w.r.t. non-privileged queues. To preserve this higher share, the I/O
of any non-weight-raised queue must be plugged whenever a sync
weight-raised queue, while being served, remains temporarily empty. To
attain this goal, bfq simply plugs any I/O (from any queue), if a sync
weight-raised queue remains empty while in service.
Unfortunately, this plugging typically lowers throughput with random
I/O, on devices with internal queueing (because it reduces the filling
level of the internal queues of the device).
This commit addresses this issue by restricting the cases where
plugging is performed: if a sync weight-raised queue remains empty
while in service, then I/O plugging is performed only if some of the
active bfq_queues are *not* weight-raised (which is actually the only
circumstance where plugging is needed to preserve the higher share of
the throughput of weight-raised queues). This restriction proved able
to boost throughput in really many use cases needing only maximum
throughput.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index e65b0da1007b4..93863c6173e66 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -3314,7 +3314,12 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because
* bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also
* weight-raised queues (see comments on
- * bfq_weights_tree_add()).
+ * bfq_weights_tree_add()). In particular, if bfqq is being
+ * weight-raised, it is important to idle only if there are
+ * other, non-weight-raised queues that may steal throughput
+ * to bfqq. Actually, we should be even more precise, and
+ * differentiate between interactive weight raising and
+ * soft real-time weight raising.
*
* As a side note, it is worth considering that the above
* device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the
@@ -3326,7 +3331,8 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* to let requests be served in the desired order until all
* the requests already queued in the device have been served.
*/
- asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 ||
+ asymmetric_scenario = (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 &&
+ bfqd->wr_busy_queues < bfqd->busy_queues) ||
!bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd);
/*
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists