lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 21:00:25 +0800
From:   Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <Andrew.Murray@....com>,
        Heyi Guo <guoheyi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Free collection mapping on
 device teardown

Hi Marc,

On 2019/11/6 0:22, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Somehow, we forgot to free the collection mapping when tearing down
> a device, hence slowly leaking mapping arrays as devices get removed
> from the system. That is, almost never.
> 
> Just to be safe, properly free the array on device teardown.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 787e8eec9a7f..07d0bde60e16 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -2471,6 +2471,7 @@ static void its_free_device(struct its_device *its_dev)
>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its_dev->its->lock, flags);
>   	list_del(&its_dev->entry);
>   	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its_dev->its->lock, flags);
> +	kfree(its_dev->event_map.col_map);

I agreed that this is the appropriate place to free the collection
mapping (act as the counterpart of the allocation which happened in
its_create_device).  But as pointed out by Heyi [1], this will
introduce a double free issue.  We'd better also drop the kfree()
in its_irq_domain_free() in this patch?

(I find that it had been dropped in the last patch in your
irq/gic-5.5-wip branch, but maybe better here.)


[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/15/329


Thanks,
Zenghui

>   	kfree(its_dev->itt);
>   	kfree(its_dev);
>   }
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ