linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191109155346.GB1367023@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 Nov 2019 16:53:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h,
> > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11
> > > hours early, if I got the timezones right.
> > > 
> > > Does PM mean something else in the above context?
> > 
> > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u
> > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought
> > that was 8:27 in the morning.
> > 
> > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better
> > string to use here.  I guess:
> > 	date --rfc-3339=seconds -u
> > would probably be best?
> 
> The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current
> format, but with 24-hour numbering.

Ah, missed that.  I'll go use that.

Also, I just remembered that if you look in the email headers, there's a
"X-KernelTest-Deadline:" field that uses the --iso-8601=minutes format.
I think kernelci uses that to parse for when it needs to finish things
by, but I don't know if that actually happens or not.

I'll go fix the string up for the next round.

thanks,

greg k-h