linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: driver for Mediatek MT7621 SoC NAND flash controller

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20191110132232.3815f1af@collabora.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Nov 2019 13:22:32 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gerg@...nel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, neil@...wn.name,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, blogic@...nwrt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: driver for Mediatek MT7621 SoC NAND flash
 controller

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 12:39:19 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:40:07 +0100
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:35:21PM +1000, gerg@...nel.org wrote:  
> > > From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Add a driver to support the NAND flash controller of the MediaTek MT7621
> > > System-on-Chip device. (This one is the MIPS based parts from Mediatek).
> > > 
> > > This code is a re-working of the earlier patches for this hardware that
> > > have been floating around the internet for years:
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/ReclaimYourPrivacy/cloak/blob/master/target/linux/ramips/patches-3.18/0045-mtd-add-mt7621-nand-support.patch
> > > 
> > > This is a much cleaned up version, put in staging to start with.
> > > It does still have some problems, mainly that it still uses a lot of the
> > > mtd raw nand legacy support.    
> > 
> > Is that an issue?  
> 
> Well, yes that's an issue since we decided that all new drivers should
> implement ->exec_op() instead of the legacy hooks. But that would be an
> issue even if we were merging the driver in staging.
> 
> > Why not just put it in the "real" part of the kernel
> > then, if those apis are still in use?
> >   
> > > The driver not only compiles, but it works well on the small range of
> > > hardware platforms that it has been used on so far. I have been using
> > > for quite a while now, cleaning up as I get time.
> > > 
> > > So... I am looking for comments on the best approach forward with this.
> > > At least in staging it can get some more eyeballs going over it.    
> > 
> > staging will just nit-pick it to death for coding style issues, it's not
> > going to be get any major api changes/cleanups there usually.  I'd
> > recommend just merging this to the "real" part of the kernel now if it's
> > working for you.  
> 
> I agree on that point: we should merge this driver directly in the NAND
> framework after it's been reworked to implement ->exec_op() instead of

  s/framework/subsystem/

> the legacy hooks.
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives