| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 13:24:49 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Cc: briannorris@...omium.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
pmeerw@...erw.net, lee.jones@...aro.org, bleung@...omium.org,
enric.balletbo@...labora.com, dianders@...omium.org,
groeck@...omium.org, fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] iio: cros_ec: Use Hertz as unit for sampling
frequency
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:26:52 -0800
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org> wrote:
> To be compliant with other sensors, set and get sensor sampling
> frequency in Hz, not mHz.
>
> Fixes: ae7b02ad2f32 ("iio: common: cros_ec_sensors: Expose
> cros_ec_sensors frequency range via iio sysfs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Good to fix. Just to check, is this going to cause you problems if it's
marked for stable?
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
I've given tags for patches partly to save me time on next version but
also on the assumption this may well go via someone else's tree.
Realistically it's unlikely it will make it in for the merge window
via IIO and may be similar via other possible paths.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Check patch with --strict option
> Alignement
> No changes in v3.
> No changes in v2.
>
> .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 32 +++++++++++--------
> .../linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h | 6 ++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> index 4169c6c055d8..f91685119cb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct cros_ec_dev *ec = sensor_hub->ec;
> struct cros_ec_sensor_platform *sensor_platform = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> u32 ver_mask;
> + int frequencies[ARRAY_SIZE(state->frequencies) / 2] = { 0 };
> int ret, i;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
> @@ -309,20 +310,22 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> state->calib[i].scale = MOTION_SENSE_DEFAULT_SCALE;
>
> /* 0 is a correct value used to stop the device */
> - state->frequencies[0] = 0;
> if (state->msg->version < 3) {
> get_default_min_max_freq(state->resp->info.type,
> - &state->frequencies[1],
> - &state->frequencies[2],
> + &frequencies[1],
> + &frequencies[2],
> &state->fifo_max_event_count);
> } else {
> - state->frequencies[1] =
> - state->resp->info_3.min_frequency;
> - state->frequencies[2] =
> - state->resp->info_3.max_frequency;
> + frequencies[1] = state->resp->info_3.min_frequency;
> + frequencies[2] = state->resp->info_3.max_frequency;
> state->fifo_max_event_count =
> state->resp->info_3.fifo_max_event_count;
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(frequencies); i++) {
> + state->frequencies[2 * i] = frequencies[i] / 1000;
> + state->frequencies[2 * i + 1] =
> + (frequencies[i] % 1000) * 1000;
> + }
>
> ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev, NULL,
> trigger_capture, NULL);
> @@ -713,7 +716,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_read(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, frequency;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> @@ -725,8 +728,10 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_read(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
> if (ret)
> break;
>
> - *val = st->resp->sensor_odr.ret;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> + frequency = st->resp->sensor_odr.ret;
> + *val = frequency / 1000;
> + *val2 = (frequency % 1000) * 1000;
> + ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -761,7 +766,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> *length = ARRAY_SIZE(state->frequencies);
> *vals = (const int *)&state->frequencies;
> - *type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> + *type = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> }
>
> @@ -783,12 +788,13 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_write(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> int val, int val2, long mask)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, frequency;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + frequency = val * 1000 + val2 / 1000;
> st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_SENSOR_ODR;
> - st->param.sensor_odr.data = val;
> + st->param.sensor_odr.data = frequency;
>
> /* Always roundup, so caller gets at least what it asks for. */
> st->param.sensor_odr.roundup = 1;
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> index bc26ae2e3272..7bc961defa87 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ typedef irqreturn_t (*cros_ec_sensors_capture_t)(int irq, void *p);
> * is always 8-byte aligned.
> * @read_ec_sensors_data: function used for accessing sensors values
> * @fifo_max_event_count: Size of the EC sensor FIFO
> + * @frequencies: Table of known available frequencies:
> + * 0, Min and Max in mHz
> */
> struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state {
> struct cros_ec_device *ec;
> @@ -74,9 +76,7 @@ struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state {
> unsigned long scan_mask, s16 *data);
>
> u32 fifo_max_event_count;
> -
> - /* Table of known available frequencies : 0, Min and Max in mHz */
> - int frequencies[3];
> + int frequencies[6];
> };
>
> int cros_ec_sensors_read_lpc(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned long scan_mask,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists