linux-kernel - Re: [0/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Software improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:57:12 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [0/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Software improvements

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 02:28:52PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I created a cover letter but failed to send it together with the series
> > :-|
> 
> Did you omit the address “linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org” from
> the recipient list intentionally?

Yes, even though it's documented to Cc: all patches there, there is IMHO
little use. If there is a dedicated mailing list, not adding lkml is
fine for all maintainers I interacted with in the last few years.

The volume on lkml is that high that sending all patches there only adds
noise.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |