linux-kernel - Re: [v3] s390/pkey: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:56:37 +0100
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Ingo Franzki <ifranzki@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
        Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
        Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>
Subject: Re: [v3] s390/pkey: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its
 implementation



On 11.11.19 09:42, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> No, I just want to have the word "fix" in the subject.
> 
> How do you think about to use the preferred subject in your final commit directly?
> (Do you insist on sending a fourth patch variant?)
> 
> 
>> If you are OK with changing the sign-off to your web.de address
> 
> Does hinder you anything from continuing to use the previous known email address?

Can you at least send a mail from sourceforge address with the Signed-off-by?
The Sign-off is meant to keep track of flow.