lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:06:07 +0000
From:   "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
CC:     "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
        "Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add
 compatible string for imx8qm

Hi Rob, Nicolin

> 
> Hi Rob
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 07:41:26PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > In order to support the two asrc modules in imx8qm, we need to add
> > > compatible string "fsl,imx8qm-asrc0" and "fsl,imx8qm-asrc1"
> >
> > Are the blocks different in some way?
> >
> > If not, why do you need to distinguish them?
> >
> The internal clock mapping is different for each module.
> 
> Or we can use one compatible string, but need add another property
> "fsl,asrc-clk-map" to distinguish the different clock map.
> 
> The change is in below.
> 
> Which one do you think is better?
> 
> Required properties:
> 
> -  - compatible         : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc" or "fsl,imx53-asrc".
> +  - compatible         : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc", "fsl,imx53-asrc",
> +                         "fsl,imx8qm-asrc".
> 
>    - reg                        : Offset and length of the register set for the device.
> 
> @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ Required properties:
> 
>     - fsl,asrc-width    : Defines a mutual sample width used by DPCM Back
> Ends.
> 
> +   - fsl,asrc-clk-map   : Defines clock map used in driver. which is required
> +                         by imx8qm
> +                         <0> - select the map for asrc0
> +                         <1> - select the map for asrc1
> +
>  Optional properties:
> 

I will do a update for this change in v3.

Best regards
Wang shengjiu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ