linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] drivers: irqchip: qcom-pdc: Move to an SoC independent compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:56:12 +0109
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mka@...omium.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] drivers: irqchip: qcom-pdc: Move to an SoC  independent compatible

On 2019-11-11 08:19, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 08 Nov 01:55 PST 2019, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/8/2019 3:10 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > On 2019-11-08 10:37, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> > > Remove the sdm845 SoC specific compatible to make the driver
>> > > easily reusable across other SoC's with the same IP block.
>> > > This will reduce further churn adding any SoC specific
>> > > compatibles unless really needed.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c | 2 +-
>> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c 
>> b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
>> > > index faa7d61b9d6c..c175333bb646 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
>> > > @@ -309,4 +309,4 @@ static int qcom_pdc_init(struct device_node
>> > > *node, struct device_node *parent)
>> > >      return ret;
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > > -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(pdc_sdm845, "qcom,sdm845-pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
>> > > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(qcom_pdc, "qcom,pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> >
>> > How do you want me get this (and the DT change) merged? I can 
>> either take
>> > these two patches in the irqchip tree, or you arrange them to be 
>> taken
>> > by the platform maintainers. Your call.
>>
>> I think it makes sense for you to take these two via your tree (The 
>> driver
>> and binding doc updates) and the DT node addition for pdc to go via 
>> Andy/Bjorn.
>> Andy/Bjorn, does that sound fine?
>>
>
> Yes, that sounds good.

Applied to irqchip/next

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...