linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] KVM: VMX: Do not change PID.NDST when loading a blocked vCPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:59:20 +0200
From:   Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
To:     Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jag Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] KVM: VMX: Do not change PID.NDST when loading a
 blocked vCPU



> On 11 Nov 2019, at 16:56, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/11/19 2:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 11/11/19 15:48, Joao Martins wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fixes: c112b5f50232 ("KVM: x86: Recompute PID.ON when clearing PID.SN")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
>>>> Something wrong in the SoB line?
>>>> 
>>> I can't spot any mistake; at least it looks chained correctly for me. What's the
>>> issue you see with the Sob line?
>> 
>> Liran's line after yours is confusing.  Did he help with the analysis or
>> anything like that?
>> 
> He was initially reviewing my patches, but then helped improving the problem
> description in the commit messages so felt correct to give credit.
> 
> 	Joao

I think proper action is to just remove me from the SoB line.

-Liran