linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove set but not used variable 'val'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64a46661-40a6-eb7e-d225-1085b86572d0@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:49:55 +0000
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>, sudeep.holla@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove set but not used variable
 'val'

On 10/11/2019 10:30, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
> 
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c: In function scmi_perf_fc_ring_db:
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c:323:7: warning: variable val set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 
> val is never used, so remove it.
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index 4a8012e3cb8c..efa98d2ee045 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -319,10 +319,8 @@ static void scmi_perf_fc_ring_db(struct scmi_fc_db_info *db)
>   		SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(64);
>   #else
>   	{
> -		u64 val = 0;
> -
>   		if (db->mask)
> -			val = ioread64_hi_lo(db->addr) & db->mask;
> +			ioread64_hi_lo(db->addr) & db->mask;
>   		iowrite64_hi_lo(db->set, db->addr);

FWIW, compared to the SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB() macro, this looks like the 
wrong "fix".

Robin.

>   	}
>   #endif
>