[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112202247.GA12877@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:22:47 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: amirmizi6@...il.com
Cc: Eyal.Cohen@...oton.com, oshrialkoby85@...il.com,
alexander.steffen@...ineon.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@...oton.com,
tmaimon77@...il.com, gcwilson@...ibm.com, kgoldman@...ibm.com,
ayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Dan.Morav@...oton.com,
oren.tanami@...oton.com, shmulik.hagar@...oton.com,
amir.mizinski@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] char: tpm: Add check_data handle to
tpm_tis_phy_ops in order to check data integrity
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:21:34PM +0200, amirmizi6@...il.com wrote:
> From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
>
> The current principles:
> - When sending command:
> 1. Host writes TPM_STS.commandReady
> 2. Host writes command
> 3. Host checks TPM received data correctly
> 4. if not go to step 1
You are probably talking about steps, right?
Please check the grammar and punctation e.g. "The current steps are
roughly done when sending a command".
> - When receiving data:
> 1. Host check TPM_STS.dataAvail is set
> 2. Host get data
> 3. Host check received data are correct.
> 4. if not Host write TPM_STS.responseRetry and go to step 1.
>
> this commit is based on previous work by Christophe Richard
Sentences in English start with a capital letter and end with a full
stop.
This is completely lacking the description what the commit does.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists