linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: turn on TPM before calling tpm_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzcddtse-4bKWaA0+ns-gVKGyQzMrYWS4n1rFpbbhKLb83z7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:28:49 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: turn on TPM before calling tpm_get_timeouts

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:23:33PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:03 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> > <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:34:18PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > With power gating moved out of the tpm_transmit code we need
> > > > to power on the TPM prior to calling tpm_get_timeouts.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
> > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: linux-stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()")
> > > > Reported-by: Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
> > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 3 ++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > index 270f43acbb77..cb101cec8f8b 100644
> > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > @@ -974,13 +974,14 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
> > > >                * to make sure it works. May as well use that command to set the
> > > >                * proper timeouts for the driver.
> > > >                */
> > > > +             tpm_chip_start(chip);
> > > >               if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
> > > >                       dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
> > > >                       rc = -ENODEV;
> > > > +                     tpm_stop_chip(chip);
> > > >                       goto out_err;
> > > >               }
> > >
> > > Couldn't this call just be removed?
> > >
> > > /Jarkko
> > >
> >
> > Probably. It will eventually get called when tpm_chip_register
> > happens. I don't know what the reason was for trying it prior to the
> > irq probe.
>
> At least tis once needed the timeouts before registration because it
> was issuing TPM commands to complete its setup.
>
> If timeouts have not been set then no TPM command should be executed.
>
> Jason
>

Would it function with the timeout values set at the beginning of
tpm_tis_core_init (max values)?