[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112203802.GD5584@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:38:02 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/23] mm/gup: track dma-pinned pages: FOLL_PIN,
FOLL_LONGTERM
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:06:37PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The cover letter is long, so the more important stuff is first:
>
> * Jason, if you or someone could look at the the VFIO cleanup (patch 8)
> and conversion to FOLL_PIN (patch 18), to make sure it's use of
> remote and longterm gup matches what we discussed during the review
> of v2, I'd appreciate it.
>
> * Also for Jason and IB: as noted below, in patch 11, I am (too?) boldly
> converting from put_user_pages() to release_pages().
Why are we doing this? I think things got confused here someplace, as
the comment still says:
/**
* put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page
* @page: pointer to page to be released
*
* Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via
* either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines
* below.
I feel like if put_user_pages() is not the correct way to undo
get_user_pages() then it needs to be deleted.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists