linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugetlbfs: convert macros to static inline, fix sparse warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7fddda6f3e47b6aeb5d6d6ea9ea28ec019d3d94.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:13:07 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, kbuild@...ts.01.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugetlbfs: convert macros to static inline, fix
 sparse warning

On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 11:45 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> huge_pte_offset() produced a sparse warning due to an improper
> return type when the kernel was built with !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE.
> Fix the bad type and also convert all the macros in this block
> to static inline wrappers.  Two existing wrappers in this block
> had lines in excess of 80 columns so clean those up as well.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Reported-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 53fc34f930d0..ef412fe0be3d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -164,38 +164,130 @@ static inline void adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(
>  {
>  }
>  
> -#define follow_hugetlb_page(m,v,p,vs,a,b,i,w,n)	({ BUG(); 0; })
> -#define follow_huge_addr(mm, addr, write)	ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
> -#define copy_hugetlb_page_range(src, dst, vma)	({ BUG(); 0; })
> +static inline long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +			struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page **pages,
> +			struct vm_area_struct **vmas, unsigned long *position,
> +			unsigned long *nr_pages, long i, unsigned int flags,
> +			int *nonblocking)
> +{
> +	BUG();

While this is not different from the original, perhaps this is
also an opportunity to change the BUG()s to WARN()s.

> +static inline int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst,
> +			struct mm_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	BUG();
> +	return 0;
> +}
[]
> +static inline void hugetlb_free_pgd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> +				unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +				unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling)
> +{
> +	BUG();
> +}
> +
> +static inline int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
> +						pte_t *dst_pte,
> +						struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
> +						unsigned long dst_addr,
> +						unsigned long src_addr,
> +						struct page **pagep)
> +{
> +	BUG();
> +	return 0;
> +}