linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84ccea513e4ff21bdd374af01574e4bf04946bb6.camel@suse.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 02:45:13 +0100
From:   Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>
To:     Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
        Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 10:03 -0400, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> > Unless I'm mistaken 7 of the first 8 of these went into sched/core
> > and are now in linux (from v5.4-rc1). It may make sense to rebase
> > on
> > that and simplify the series.
> > 
> Thanks a lot for pointing this out. We shall test on a rebased 5.4 RC
> and post the changes soon, if the tests goes well. For v3, while
> rebasing
> to an RC kernel, we saw perf regressions and hence did not check the
> RC kernel this time. You are absolutely right that we can simplify
> the
> patch series with 5.4 RC.
> 
And, in case it's useful to anybody, here's a rebase of this series on
top of 5.4-rc7:

https://github.com/dfaggioli/linux/tree/wip/sched/v5.4-rc7-coresched

This also includes Tim's patch (this one
<5e3cea14-28d1-bf1e-cabe-fb5b48fdeadc@...ux.intel.com>) and is, for
now, *only* compile tested.

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)