[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5603724.uI2RiKDNrm@positron.chronox.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:43:42 +0100
From: Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ray Strode <rstrode@...hat.com>,
William Jon McCann <mccann@....edu>,
zhangjs <zachary@...shancloud.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
"Peter, Matthias" <matthias.peter@....bund.de>,
Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Roman Drahtmueller <draht@...altsekun.de>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 00/12] /dev/random - a new approach with full SP800-90B compliance
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2019, 14:23:10 CET schrieb Florian Weimer:
Hi Florian,
> * Stephan Müller:
> > * support deactivation of TRNG (i.e. blocking behavior of /dev/random)
> >
> > at compile time. If deactivated, /dev/random behaves like
> > getrandom(2).
>
> I don't quite understand this comment. Doesn't getrandom with the
> GRND_RANDOM always behave like /dev/random? Presumably, without the
> TRNG tap, the GRND_RANDOM flag for getrandom is ignored, and reading
> from /dev/random behaves like reading from /dev/urandom.
Absolutely. Apologies for the imprecision here. I will correct that.
The idea is that the constant blocking behavior of /dev/random and GRND_RANDOM
is replaced with the blocking behavior of getrandom(2) without the GRND_RANDOM
flag (i.e. the interface waits until the LRNG thinks it is completely seeded
before it provides ulimited data).
>
> Anyway, reading the accompanying PDF, this looks rather impressive:
> the userspace bootstrapping problem is gone (the issue where waiting
> for more entropy prevents the collection of more entropy), *and* we
> can still make the standards people happy.
>
> (Replying from my other account due to mail issues, sorry.)
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists