linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add new bit field PA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MN2PR04MB69910D7CB55980F2C498A468FC770@MN2PR04MB6991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:53:33 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "nguyenb@...eaurora.org" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
        "rnayak@...eaurora.org" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        "salyzyn@...gle.com" <salyzyn@...gle.com>
CC:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add new bit field PA_INIT to UECDL
 register

 
> 
> Add new bit field (bit-15) PA_INIT to UECDL register, this will correctly handle
> any PA_INIT error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>

This is a HCI3.0 change, so maybe make note of that?
But UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_CODE_MASK isn't being used anywhere, better just remove it, don't you think?
Instead, while at it, fix ufshcd_update_uic_error to check UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR when checking for data link layer errors?