linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 14/16] x86/iopl: Restrict iopl() permission scope

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911121106450.1833@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:07:04 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 14/16] x86/iopl: Restrict iopl() permission scope

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > +static void task_update_io_bitmap(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct thread_struct *t = &current->thread;
> > +
> > +	preempt_disable();
> > +	if (t->iopl_emul == 3 || t->io_bitmap) {
> > +		/* TSS update is handled on exit to user space */
> > +		set_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
> > +	} else {
> > +		clear_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
> > +		/* Invalidate TSS */
> > +		tss_update_io_bitmap();
> > +	}
> > +	preempt_enable();
> > +}
> > +
> >  void io_bitmap_exit(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct io_bitmap *iobm = current->thread.io_bitmap;
> >  
> > -	preempt_disable();
> >  	current->thread.io_bitmap = NULL;
> > -	clear_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
> > -	tss_update_io_bitmap();
> > -	preempt_enable();
> > +	task_update_io_bitmap();
> 
> BTW., isn't the preempt_disable()/enable() sequence only needed around 
> the tss_update_io_bitmap() call?
> 
> ->iopl_emul, ->io_bitmap and TIF_IO_BITMAP can only be set by the current 
> task AFAICS.
> 
> I.e. critical section could be narrowed a bit.

Yes.