linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: Move swap_[de]activate to file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191111164320.80f814161469055b14f27045@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:43:20 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: Move swap_[de]activate to file_operations

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:34:52 -0800 ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:

> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> 
> swap_activate() and swap_deactivate() have nothing to do with
> address spaces.  We want to eventually make the address space operations
> dynamic to switch inode flags on the fly.

What does this mean?

>  So to simplify this code as
> well as properly track these operations we move these functions to the
> file_operations vector.
> 
> This has been tested with XFS but not NFS, f2fs, or btrfs.
> 
> Also note f2fs and xfs have simple moves of their functions to
> facilitate compilation.  No functional changes are contained within
> those functions.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -11002,6 +11002,8 @@ static const struct file_operations btrfs_dir_file_operations = {
>  #endif
>  	.release        = btrfs_release_file,
>  	.fsync		= btrfs_sync_file,
> +	.swap_activate	= btrfs_swap_activate,
> +	.swap_deactivate = btrfs_swap_deactivate,
>  };

Shouldn't this be btrfs_file_operations?